Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Prophecy & End Times >> RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  87 88 [89] 90 91   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/6/2010 11:44:24 PM   
Wayne230

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 1/3/2010
From: Portland Oregon
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

I agree He will return.


Again how many times will/does Jesus come to Israel?



we agree on that Praise the Lord! the OT says Jesus will set foot on the Mount of Olives and we the elect will reign with him for a thousand years! I don't know about you but thats exciting.

_____________________________

I am not perfect just forgiven
Post #: 2201
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 12:03:31 AM   
Wayne230

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 1/3/2010
From: Portland Oregon
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

I agree He will return.


Again how many times will/does Jesus come to Israel?

Thats good that we can agree on that. If I know the Old Testament Jesus will set his feet on the mount of Olives. and we who are the saints will reign with him for ever

< Message edited by Wayne230 -- 1/7/2010 12:20:42 AM >


_____________________________

I am not perfect just forgiven
Post #: 2202
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 1:01:59 AM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Wayne230 (and I say "Shalom" to everyone; I'm not Jewish either, except through the Messiah, but I AM a Messianic believer).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayne230

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Wayne.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayfaring Stranger

Hi Roy,
quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Leonelrb.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonelrb

Hello Retrobyter,
quote:

(Oh, and we WILL be getting back our physical bodies--"spiritual" bodies does NOT mean that they are immaterial but that they are SUPER bodies!)

Thank you very much for that great explanation. I am still struggling with the quote above. Are you saying that this physical body will be similar to the body Adam and Eve had before they sinned, or will this be a superior body? Will these physical beings be able to reproduce again?


I believe that Adam and Chavah (Eve) had better bodies than we have today, but Adam's body was inferior to the body of the "Second Adam" after Yeshua`s resurrection, according to I Cor. 15:44-49.

Will these physical beings be able to reproduce again? Frankly, I don't know. I know that we will "neither marry nor be given in marriage," according to Yeshua`, but whether that includes reproduction or not, I don't know. I rather believe that it does, but there's no proof that I know of. So, my gut reaction is to say, no, they will not reproduce, but don't take my word on it.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

The ones alive for the 1,000 years are the first to receive immortal bodies, if they are not married they will not be having children. If their population remains static then the way they 'parent' would be to the children that are born to the ones who live outside the Holy City in the New Earth. The children being born would be like grandchildren are to us.

These topics keep going back to if the 70 weeks have been fulfilled or not. I'm not if that point can be argued in any other thread?


Yes, and that is the distant link and why this discussion ended up in this thread. I am NOT of the opinion that the 70 weeks have been fulfilled. I believe that there are 3.5 weeks left (not 7). So, I am not a pretrib, posttrib, midtrib, or prewrath, nor am I a full preterist. However, I completely believe in a millennium--not to describe the length of the Messiah's Kingdom, but to describe the length of time haSatan is incarcerated in the bottomless pit.

ON THE OTHER HAND, when one harmonizes II Peter 3:3-13, I Corinthians 15:20-28, and Revelation 20:1-15, then one finds that the Messiah reigns during the Millennium until He has subdued all of His enemies, the last enemy being Death, and then He turns over the Empire to His Father God while He remains the King of Isra'el. Furthermore, we have some SIGNIFICANT things that are said to be "forever" and are thus part of the New Earth with its New Sky and the New Jerusalem its capital city.

Ps 89:34-37
34 My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.
35 Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David.
36 His seed shall endure forever, and his throne as the sun before me.
37 It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah.
KJV

Eccl 1:4
4 One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
KJV

Isa 65:17-25
17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.
18 But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.
19 And I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in my people: and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.
20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.
21 And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.
22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
23 They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them.
24 And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.
25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord.
KJV

Isa 66:20-24
20 And they shall bring all your brethren for an offering unto the Lord out of all nations upon horses, and in chariots, and in litters, and upon mules, and upon swift beasts, to my holy mountain Jerusalem, saith the Lord, as the children of Israel bring an offering in a clean vessel into the house of the Lord.
21 And I will also take of them for priests and for Levites, saith the Lord.
22 For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain.
23 And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord.
24 And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh.
KJV

Rev 22:3-5
3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
5 And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
KJV


In the Messiah's love,
Roy



Hi yourself!

I am not Jewish in case that wasn't clear but I am sympathetic toward Israel. I bring up Israel to show that the tribulation could not have happened in 70ad. what happened was that Israel was scattered through the nations.Jesus warned of that in Matthiew 24 to be sure, but that is not the same thing as the tribulation.I believe Isaiah is talking about a physical and a real Jerusalem which we who love Jesus will be part of. we have not seen that yet but that is coming. It seems to me that if the new Jerusalem or Heaven will not experience night and will see Jesus as in Revelation it seems impossible to me that any of that could have happened in 70ad. what will happen to us as believers is yet to take place. but Israel will recognize Jesus as its Messiah. he is what the Tribulation is all about. for that reason I believe we won't be part of that but will see him face to face.


I guess I'm going to have to be more specific to whom I'm addressing. See, "Wayfaring Stranger's" name is Wayne, too. He's the one to whom I wrote all of the above, but that's okay! While I have your response, let me just say that you should not be so tied to labels. "Tribulation" is an unfortunate word because it is now treated as a label when really the Greek word, "thlipsis," strictly means "pressure," even though it was translated "tribulation." The pressure that was put on the Jews to which Yeshua` was referring in Matt. 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 is MUCH longer than a mere 7 years and it IS that "scattering" about which you were talking! It's been going on for some 1,980 years now, and thanks to the Orthodox Jewish view of Yeshua`, it shows no sign of letting up for the foreseeable future, although the Messianic Movement is seeing thousands of Jews coming to recognize Yeshua` (Jesus) as their Messiah! This "pressure" actually began shortly after the Messiah's ascension closer to 30 A.D. and still continues today in 2010 A.D.

I do agree with you, however, that Isra'el will recognize Yeshua` as its Messiah. In fact, Yeshua` promised they wouldn't see Him again until they could welcome Him back (Matt. 23:37-29). There remain (IMO) 3.5 years of the 70 "sevens" of years (490 years) in the prophecy given to Dani'el by Gavri'el in Dan. 9:24-27. While most claim that there remain 7 years, Yeshua`s 3.5-year "ministry" when He offered Himself as Isra'el's King reduced that final 7 years to half. Thus, after Isra'el's "blindness in part" is healed completely, the count will resume and the last 3.5 years will finish the prophecy.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2203
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 1:49:12 AM   
Wayne230

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 1/3/2010
From: Portland Oregon
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Wayne230 (and I say "Shalom" to everyone; I'm not Jewish either, except through the Messiah, but I AM a Messianic believer).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayne230

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Wayne.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayfaring Stranger

Hi Roy,
quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Leonelrb.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonelrb

Hello Retrobyter,
quote:

(Oh, and we WILL be getting back our physical bodies--"spiritual" bodies does NOT mean that they are immaterial but that they are SUPER bodies!)

Thank you very much for that great explanation. I am still struggling with the quote above. Are you saying that this physical body will be similar to the body Adam and Eve had before they sinned, or will this be a superior body? Will these physical beings be able to reproduce again?


I believe that Adam and Chavah (Eve) had better bodies than we have today, but Adam's body was inferior to the body of the "Second Adam" after Yeshua`s resurrection, according to I Cor. 15:44-49.

Will these physical beings be able to reproduce again? Frankly, I don't know. I know that we will "neither marry nor be given in marriage," according to Yeshua`, but whether that includes reproduction or not, I don't know. I rather believe that it does, but there's no proof that I know of. So, my gut reaction is to say, no, they will not reproduce, but don't take my word on it.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

The ones alive for the 1,000 years are the first to receive immortal bodies, if they are not married they will not be having children. If their population remains static then the way they 'parent' would be to the children that are born to the ones who live outside the Holy City in the New Earth. The children being born would be like grandchildren are to us.

These topics keep going back to if the 70 weeks have been fulfilled or not. I'm not if that point can be argued in any other thread?


Yes, and that is the distant link and why this discussion ended up in this thread. I am NOT of the opinion that the 70 weeks have been fulfilled. I believe that there are 3.5 weeks left (not 7). So, I am not a pretrib, posttrib, midtrib, or prewrath, nor am I a full preterist. However, I completely believe in a millennium--not to describe the length of the Messiah's Kingdom, but to describe the length of time haSatan is incarcerated in the bottomless pit.

ON THE OTHER HAND, when one harmonizes II Peter 3:3-13, I Corinthians 15:20-28, and Revelation 20:1-15, then one finds that the Messiah reigns during the Millennium until He has subdued all of His enemies, the last enemy being Death, and then He turns over the Empire to His Father God while He remains the King of Isra'el. Furthermore, we have some SIGNIFICANT things that are said to be "forever" and are thus part of the New Earth with its New Sky and the New Jerusalem its capital city.

Ps 89:34-37
34 My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.
35 Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David.
36 His seed shall endure forever, and his throne as the sun before me.
37 It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah.
KJV

Eccl 1:4
4 One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
KJV

Isa 65:17-25
17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.
18 But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.
19 And I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in my people: and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.
20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.
21 And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.
22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
23 They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them.
24 And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.
25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord.
KJV

Isa 66:20-24
20 And they shall bring all your brethren for an offering unto the Lord out of all nations upon horses, and in chariots, and in litters, and upon mules, and upon swift beasts, to my holy mountain Jerusalem, saith the Lord, as the children of Israel bring an offering in a clean vessel into the house of the Lord.
21 And I will also take of them for priests and for Levites, saith the Lord.
22 For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain.
23 And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord.
24 And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh.
KJV

Rev 22:3-5
3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
5 And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
KJV


In the Messiah's love,
Roy



Hi yourself!

I am not Jewish in case that wasn't clear but I am sympathetic toward Israel. I bring up Israel to show that the tribulation could not have happened in 70ad. what happened was that Israel was scattered through the nations.Jesus warned of that in Matthiew 24 to be sure, but that is not the same thing as the tribulation.I believe Isaiah is talking about a physical and a real Jerusalem which we who love Jesus will be part of. we have not seen that yet but that is coming. It seems to me that if the new Jerusalem or Heaven will not experience night and will see Jesus as in Revelation it seems impossible to me that any of that could have happened in 70ad. what will happen to us as believers is yet to take place. but Israel will recognize Jesus as its Messiah. he is what the Tribulation is all about. for that reason I believe we won't be part of that but will see him face to face.


I guess I'm going to have to be more specific to whom I'm addressing. See, "Wayfaring Stranger's" name is Wayne, too. He's the one to whom I wrote all of the above, but that's okay! While I have your response, let me just say that you should not be so tied to labels. "Tribulation" is an unfortunate word because it is now treated as a label when really the Greek word, "thlipsis," strictly means "pressure," even though it was translated "tribulation." The pressure that was put on the Jews to which Yeshua` was referring in Matt. 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 is MUCH longer than a mere 7 years and it IS that "scattering" about which you were talking! It's been going on for some 1,980 years now, and thanks to the Orthodox Jewish view of Yeshua`, it shows no sign of letting up for the foreseeable future, although the Messianic Movement is seeing thousands of Jews coming to recognize Yeshua` (Jesus) as their Messiah! This "pressure" actually began shortly after the Messiah's ascension closer to 30 A.D. and still continues today in 2010 A.D.

I do agree with you, however, that Isra'el will recognize Yeshua` as its Messiah. In fact, Yeshua` promised they wouldn't see Him again until they could welcome Him back (Matt. 23:37-29). There remain (IMO) 3.5 years of the 70 "sevens" of years (490 years) in the prophecy given to Dani'el by Gavri'el in Dan. 9:24-27. While most claim that there remain 7 years, Yeshua`s 3.5-year "ministry" when He offered Himself as Isra'el's King reduced that final 7 years to half. Thus, after Isra'el's "blindness in part" is healed completely, the count will resume and the last 3.5 years will finish the prophecy.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

I am sorry, I didn't realize there were two Waynes on here. I think it says they will look upon whom they pierced. which is Jesus. Someday he will help us understand it all and that is what will matter

_____________________________

I am not perfect just forgiven
Post #: 2204
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 2:42:12 AM   
Reba

 

Posts: 771
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayne230

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

I agree He will return.


Again how many times will/does Jesus come to Israel?

Thats good that we can agree on that. If I know the Old Testament Jesus will set his feet on the mount of Olives. and we who are the saints will reign with him for ever


Is that the literal mountian? If so then does Christ straddle the mount as it splits?

How many times does Christ come to Israel?

_____________________________

Chapter and verse are posted so all may look up the context.
Post #: 2205
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 12:27:29 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Reba.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayne230

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

I agree He will return.


Again how many times will/does Jesus come to Israel?

Thats good that we can agree on that. If I know the Old Testament Jesus will set his feet on the mount of Olives. and we who are the saints will reign with him for ever


Is that the literal mountain? If so then does Christ straddle the mount as it splits?

How many times does Christ come to Israel?


Yes, that is literally the mountain, and no, He does not straddle the mount as it splits. In Isra'el (in Hebrew) it is called "Har haZeitiym" (pronounced "har hah-zay-TEAM") literally "Mountain [of] the-Olives." It is just east of Jerusalem outside of the city wall where the Temple used to stand. Now, the Dome of the Rock stands where the Temple used to stand. There are gates that were made of brass in the city wall that are now below the ground level. When the Messiah (the Christ) returns, He will open those gates. To do so, He creates a valley splitting apart the mountain, the gates, and the Islamic graveyard planted between the two. Furthermore, the rift will run all the way to the Dead Sea for it will provide the course for the river foretold in the prophecy of Yechezk'el (the book of Ezekiel).

The Messiah comes to Isra'el--His HOME--twice! The first time, He came as haMashiach ben-Yosef (the Messiah the Son of Joseph, the Suffering Messiah); the second time, He will come as haMashiach ben-Daviyd (the Messiah the Son of David, the Conquering Messiah). The first time He came as the Lamb; when He comes again He will come as the Lion of the Tribe of Y'hudah! Every rabbi knows that there were two sets of prophecies about the Messiah, the ultimate King from the line of David. Thus, the divided them into the two sets: haMashiach ben Yosef and haMashiach ben Daviyd. They were doing this before the Messiah came the first time! It was always a puzzle for them: How could the Messiah die and still reign over the world forever?

That's why Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist) asked his question: "Are you he that should come or do we look for another?" What he was asking was, "Is there but one Messiah or are there two?" To answer this, Yeshua` performed the miracles that haMashiach ben Daviyd would do to show John and JOHN'S DISCIPLES that He would be the ONLY Messiah in two comings. Remember: John came "in the spirit of Eliyahu (Elijah)!" For him, he knew that he was NOT Eliyahu but he was the one prophesied to come AS Eliyahu; so, he asked the question.

It is not only where His home was, but it is where His RELATIVES live! It is His country, and it is His HERITAGE! He will inherit the throne of His ancestor Daviyd! It will be His "base of operations" when He becomes King of kings! That phrase "king of kings" was also used of Nebuchadnezzar to describe him as an emperor. He was indeed a king to kings, a king over kings! So shall be the Messiah: He will reign over the entire world, at least by the end of the 1000 years, and be a King to kings--a King over kings--the King of kings--the Emperor of the World! That's why Nebuchadnezzar was given the dream in Dani'el chapter 2. The stone, that was cut out of the mountain that strikes the image in the feet, grows until it itself becomes a huge mountain that fills the earth! That stone is the Messiah's Kingdom.

In the Messiah's love and longing for His return,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2206
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 12:51:03 PM   
Reba

 

Posts: 771
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline
You dare to call Jesus Thee Son of God the son of Joseph?

My Bible tells me God sent HIS son....John 3 16

_____________________________

Chapter and verse are posted so all may look up the context.
Post #: 2207
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 3:00:38 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom (which means "Peace"), Reba.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

You dare to call Jesus Thee Son of God the son of Joseph?

My Bible tells me God sent HIS son....John 3 16


Just simmer down, now. I'M not daring to call Him that; I'm telling you that the Rabbis down through the years have called the PROPHECIES ABOUT THE MESSIAH either prophecies about the Messiah ben Daviyd or prophecies about the Messiah ben Yosef, the "son of Joseph." Furthermore, they only called Him "the son of Joseph" in the sense that he would suffer AS Joseph suffered until he was exalted in Egypt as 2nd to the Pharaoh! They KNEW He wasn't the actual son of Joseph or even a descendent of Joseph; they were simply labeling Him as One who would suffer as in Psalm 22 and Isaiah 53. Understand?

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2208
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 3:10:12 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, again, Reba.

Oh, and as a P.S., remember: Yeshua` WAS (and IS) the actual descendent of Daviyd the King! His human mother, Miryam (Mary), came from Daviyd's line (Luke 3), and His adopting father, Yosef (Joseph) came from Daviyd's line as well (Matt. 1)! In fact, Mattityahu (Matthew) used that fact to show that Yeshua` could lay claim to the throne of Daviyd!

Furthermore, don't forget that Luke records the words of Gavri'el (Gabriel):

Luke 1:30-33
30 And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God.
31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.
32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
KJV


And, there's no reason not to take what he said LITERALLY!

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2209
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 5:25:12 PM   
Reba

 

Posts: 771
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline
1Jn 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
1Jn 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
1Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
1Jn 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
2Jn 1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
2Jn 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
2Jn 1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.



Becauuse a man is studied and posseses the title Rabbi does not make him and more of God then good ol filthy jimmy swaggart. It is our relationship with Him that makes us of God.

Do you have a different reading on the verses above or does Gods Word say what it says?

_____________________________

Chapter and verse are posted so all may look up the context.
Post #: 2210
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/7/2010 11:19:41 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Reba.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

1Jn 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
1Jn 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
1Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
1Jn 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
2Jn 1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
2Jn 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
2Jn 1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

Because a man is studied and possesses the title Rabbi does not make him any more of God then good ol' filthy Jimmy Swaggart. It is our relationship with Him that makes us of God.

Do you have a different reading on the verses above or does Gods Word say what it says?

First, God's Word says what it says; there are not two ways to understand what you posted, and I have no qualms about those verses. I would NEVER deny that Yeshua` is the very Messiah of God that was promised so often in the prophecies of the Bible! Nor would I ever deny that He is the Son of God! Furthermore, I KNOW that He has literally come in the flesh! What is your problem?! What are you thinking?!

Second, I have no special love for Jimmy Swaggart either, but I'd be careful if I were you about how you attack one of God's children:

Rom 14:4, 7-13
4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand.
...
7 For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.
8 For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's.
9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.
10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.
KJV


Third, it's a GOOD THING to recognize that Yeshua` was a descendant of Daviyd! It is also a GOOD THING to recognize that prophecies promised that He would not only reign forever but that He would suffer and die for our sins! The Jewish Rabbis may not have understood all that was entailed in those prophecies, but the prophecies are GOD'S WORD!!! Furthermore, recognizing that Yeshua` was a descendant of Daviyd does not detract from the fact that He was the very Son of God! We KNOW that God was His real Father! Notice two things, please. First, I said that His NATURAL MOTHER, Miryam (Mary), was of the seed of Daviyd. Second, I said that the man who ADOPTED Him was Yosef (Joseph), and that Yosef was also of the seed of Daviyd! Neither of these facts detract from the fact that God was His REAL FATHER! So, what's your beef? Or, do you just NATURALLY have that chip on your shoulder?

Fourth, speaking of verses, let's put the shoe on the other foot! It's YOUR TURN to be on the defensive: YOU don't have some other take on the verses I quoted, namely Luke 1:30-33, DO YOU?

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2211
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/8/2010 9:51:48 AM   
Reba

 

Posts: 771
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline
No problem to know in ones head Mary and Josehp were married. Both were of the house of David.I have known that all my life. ( Good grief over 60 years now ) The problem is when the soul/heart /spirit (hope you get the meaning) does not reconize Christ is the Son of God come in the flesh. That group, person, peoples, etc is antichrist.

.....2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God......


Problem with Luke 1:30- 33 Nope not one bit. I fully believe...

32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.

I believe His kingdom was/is established and that there shall be no end, He is King. He is King of Kings.


I do not concider Swaggart a brother.

Some times with the using of the different spellings you use and the the double names (ie Miryam (Mary), your posts can be a bit hard to follow. I will try and read more carefully please in the same manner do not think my lack of good use of words or proper grammar, are anything other than just that.

_____________________________

Chapter and verse are posted so all may look up the context.
Post #: 2212
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/8/2010 10:52:50 AM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Reba.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reba

No problem to know in ones head Mary and Josehp were married. Both were of the house of David.I have known that all my life. ( Good grief over 60 years now ) The problem is when the soul/heart /spirit (hope you get the meaning) does not reconize Christ is the Son of God come in the flesh. That group, person, peoples, etc is antichrist.

.....2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God......


Problem with Luke 1:30- 33 Nope not one bit. I fully believe...

32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.

I believe His kingdom was/is established and that there shall be no end, He is King. He is King of Kings.


I do not concider Swaggart a brother.

Some times with the using of the different spellings you use and the the double names (ie Miryam (Mary), your posts can be a bit hard to follow. I will try and read more carefully please in the same manner do not think my lack of good use of words or proper grammar, are anything other than just that.

Good. I'm cool with all of that except perhaps Yeshua` currently being a King. I believe His Kingdom will be literal and physical. Therefore, I don't believe He takes His role as King until He returns.

That's okay about Swaggart, too, but we don't really know who's saved and who's not. The worst looking biker in the world could be a brother! So, one should be careful just the same.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2213
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/11/2010 4:45:10 PM   
Eutychus


Posts: 9201
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Dothan, AL
Status: offline
quote:

...that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

Thanks for quoting this passage. Would that be like Jimmy Swaggart, while the head of an international TV ministry, getting caught patronizing prostitutes, crying crockodile tears for the cameras, only to get caught again 3 years later doing more of he same and telling his church God was with him and it was none of their business?

_____________________________

Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent." -John 6:29
Post #: 2214
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/12/2010 2:18:29 AM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Eutychus.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Eutychus

quote:

...that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

Thanks for quoting this passage. Would that be like Jimmy Swaggart, while the head of an international TV ministry, getting caught patronizing prostitutes, crying crockodile tears for the cameras, only to get caught again 3 years later doing more of he same and telling his church God was with him and it was none of their business?

Now, now, let's not be too bitter. Yes, it can be a real problem when those who call themselves "Christian" give Christ a black eye and hurt others in the process. However, even then a man may be truly a child of God, but frequently falling into the same trap! It may not be a sign that he is an unbeliever, but a believer who has been trapped in the Guilt Trip of Satan; you know what I mean? He may fall into a sin; ask for forgiveness; promise the Lord that he'll never do it again; but focus so heavily on what he's trying to avoid (and avoid it in his own power), that he ends up doing that same sin again!

It's an AWFUL dilemma! After tripping up the same way so many times, and having made so many promises to God that he'd never do it again, and doing it again ANYWAY, that he may feel there's no more of God's forgiveness for him!

All the while, the REAL problem is NOT that he isn't a believer, that he isn't a child of God, but that he has somehow learned the wrong things about God and has learned NOTHING about how God is supposed to live this life for him through His Spirit!

Oh, and by the way, this dilemma is NOT "habitually practicing sin" as John talks about in his letters; that is reserved for the one who LOVES to practice the sin! These people who continue to trip over the same weakness are TORTURED with this dilemma! It gnaws at them frequently if not daily, and they may ask themselves, "Can I EVER be free?" or "How can I be a Christian and continually fall into the same sin?"

They need counseling and to know about God's LOVE and how to let go and let God do His work! If you're in a pit with a pushbroom, and it's raining, and mud is sliding down the sides of the pit, how long can you stay clean? You push the mud back on this side, but it flows threateningly from a different direction. You push the mud back on that side, and it flows at you from yet a different direction! How will one ever get free of the mud?! The answer is simple, but difficult for the person in the pit to see! Have someone drop you a rope who can haul you straight up out of the pit!

The warning still stands; be careful judging another Man's servant!

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2215
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/12/2010 10:33:12 AM   
Reba

 

Posts: 771
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline
Follow the money. My last word on Swaggart.. Years back I heard an interview with Jerry Lee Lewis ( Jimmy's cousin) .... the reporter asked something to the effect of ...... Jimmy is a preacher what does he think of your lifestyle..... to which Jerry answered something like ....things are not always what they appear to be......Jimmy has enough scripture knowledge to know fornication is a sin. He was just able to cover it for years....


To the topic before we get a time out again

A couple questions...

Why would the King of Kings lower Himself to the throne of a man.
The scripture names Him King of Kings.

Why do you not believe Him to be The King of Kings?

_____________________________

Chapter and verse are posted so all may look up the context.
Post #: 2216
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/12/2010 10:47:26 AM   
Eutychus


Posts: 9201
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Dothan, AL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Eutychus.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Eutychus

quote:

...that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

Thanks for quoting this passage. Would that be like Jimmy Swaggart, while the head of an international TV ministry, getting caught patronizing prostitutes, crying crockodile tears for the cameras, only to get caught again 3 years later doing more of he same and telling his church God was with him and it was none of their business?

Now, now, let's not be too bitter....

Bitter? Why on earth would comparing the verse you quoted to a known pervert be bitterness. I have no connection to the man, except for the stain he put on the untold numbers of ministers who keep their pants zipped and their minds on serving others like Christ would have them?

I think the word you were looking for is "disgusted" or "nauseous" but not "bitter" because it simply doesn't fit. It, however, fits the pasage you quoted about stumbling block and an occasion to cause another to fall.

quote:

The warning still stands; be careful judging another Man's servant!

Would that include your rather long condemnation of me?

Jesus Himself taught that we are to discern evil in our midst and call it for what it is. Paul wrote a great deal on the subject.

_____________________________

Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent." -John 6:29
Post #: 2217
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/12/2010 11:15:41 AM   
ta_mosquito


Posts: 11822
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
MODERATOR'S NOTE :: ATTENTION PLEASE

Please take further discussion of Jimmy Swaggart to a new thread. It's way off topic here.

Please do not reply to this message within the forums or chat.

Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns.

Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.
Post #: 2218
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 1/12/2010 1:30:09 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Eutychus.

I've had nothing but respect for you! I appreciate the way that you step in and call a spade a spade! Since when have I ever shown you "long condemnation?!" I truly am sorry if you got such an opinion from one of my posts! Please forgive me, brother. Sometimes I am quite out-spoken and passionate about some things, but I try not to apply my feelings to the person, but to the topic, as much as is possible for me. Feel free to PM me and we can hash this out in a more private setting, but I really had no idea that you were harboring such thoughts!

Sorry, moderator ta_mosquito, but since this was publicly voiced in this thread, I felt I should address it here publicly as well.

I'm done.

Always, always, ALWAYS in the Messiah's love for you, Eutychus!
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2219
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 3/10/2010 5:16:12 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Stormcrow.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stormcrow

No need to worry, Roy: the 70 weeks are completely fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The following is cross-posted from the "Revelation Question" thread:

Ntech...

The translators are wrong. Here, again, is the passage literally translated from the Greek with Strong's Reference numbers beside them:
quote:


|2532| And
|2784| will be proclaimed
|5124| this
|2098| Good News
|3588| of the
|0932| kingdom
|1722| in
|3680| all
|3588| the
|3625| inhabited earth
|1519| for
|3142| a testimony
|3956| to all
|3588| the
|1484| nations,
|2532| and
|5119| then
|2240| will come
|3588| the
|5156| end.

Strong's Ref. # 3625
Romanized oikoumene
Pronounced oy-kou-men'-ay

feminine participle present passive of GSN3611 (as noun, by implication of GSN1093); land, i.e. the (terrene part of the) globe; specifically, the Roman empire:
KJV--earth, world.


In doing further research on this word, I found the following:

quote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecumene

Ecumene (also spelled œcumene or oikoumene) a term originally used in the Greco-Roman world to refer to the inhabited earth (or at least the known part of it). The term derives from the Greek οἰκουμένη (oikouménē, the feminine present middle participle of the verb οἰκέω, oikéō, "to inhabit"), short for οἰκουμένη γῆ "inhabited world".[1] In modern connotations it refers either to the projection of a united Christian Church or to world civilizations.

Over time, the word came to mean the civilized world, and to be synonymous with the Roman Empire. This usage continued after the division of the Empire into East and West, and the East Roman Emperors would use the term to describe their imperial administration. Constantinople itself came to be known as the "Ecumenical City". The word was adopted within Christianity, especially for Synods called by the Emperors and composed of bishops throughout the world (see Ecumenical Councils).


I am quite aware of what "oikoumenee" means. Stemming from "oikeoo" meaning "to occupy a house; to reside," and in turn, from "oikos" meaning "a dwelling; a family" or a HOME, as we would say today, the word simply means "wherever human beings reside on the globe!" It's wrong to limit it to just the Roman Empire, in spite of the audacity of the Roman Emperor to think he ruled over it all (Luke 2:1). The term means MORE than just the Roman Empire as evidenced by its use in Romans 10:18:
Rom 10:16-21
16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
18 But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.
19 But I say, Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.
20 But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me.
21 But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.
KJV


In using this word, Paul quotes from Psalm 19:

Ps 19:1-6
1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,
5 Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race.
6 His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.
KJV


If Paul was using the Greek language (as was probable to a congregation in Roma, Italia), then he used "oikoumenee" to translate the Hebrew word "teeveel" which is said by Strong's to mean...

OT:8398 tebel (tay-bale'); from OT:2986; the earth (as moist and therefore inhabited); by extension, the globe; by implication, its inhabitants; specifically, a partic. land, as Babylonia, Palestine:
KJV - habitable part, world.
(Biblesoft's New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright © 1994, 2003, 2006 Biblesoft, Inc. and International Bible Translators, Inc.)


With one minor correction (namely, that an "undotted bet" in Hebrew is a "vet" and pronounced as a "v"), hence "teeveel" (where "ee" is pronounced "ay" as in "hay"), this Hebrew word means the "WHOLE INHABITED WORLD" or "wherever people live." It's the human biosphere as seen by the words about the sun and the whole earth that is within its "circuit." There is nowhere (on the face of the globe) hidden from its heat. Thus, it means "EVERY PEOPLE" on the globe, including those people who live outside of the Roman Empire, which only stretched from Spain to the borders of Syria and from England to lower Egypt. The Roman Empire didn't even include other KNOWN nations, such as Persia or Armenia, let alone all the other nations we know also existed during that time period, such as China, India, Mongolia, and Pre-Classical Mayans!

No, this word needs to be understood as much broader than the Roman Empire.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stormcrow
Bob97 had an excellent post about how this error crept first into Protestantism, then Evangelicalism:

quote:

Luther became convinced that the prophecies of Daniel were about the Roman Catholic Church and that Papal Rome was indeed the antichrist of the Bible prophecy. Hundreds of thousands of people left the RCC. In retaliation the RCC began a campaign to counter the claims of Luther at the Council of Trent. The Jesuits were commissioned by the Pope to develop a new interpretation of Scripture that would counteract the Protestant application of the RCC. Francisco Ribera, a Jesuit priest published a commentary on Revelation as a counter-interpretation in 1590. Ribera applied all of Revelation except the earliest chapters to the end time rather than to the history of the Church. Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and would rebuild the temple. “Ribera denied the Protestant Scriptural Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2) as seated in the church of God—asserted by Augustine, Jerome, Luther and many reformers. He set on an infidel Antichrist, outside the church of God.

For almost 300 years the Jesuit Futurism remained largely inside the RCC but in the 1800s the process of adoption into the Protestants began. There were many steps to this adoption but it really all came to a head with Nelson Darby when he became a strong promoter of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture followed by a one man antichrist; this teaching became the hallmark of Dispensationalist. It was Darby who laid much of the foundation for the present popular removal of Daniel’s 70th week away from history and applied it to a future tribulation after the rapture. Cyrus Ingerson Scofield later adopted the teaching of Darby into his Scofield Reference Bible and this doctrine became firmly established inside the 20th century American Church


These are the facts as I see them from my research.


While Bob's source deals mainly with the interpretation of Daniel 9, it applies to our discussion because Daniel 9 is specifically mentioned in Matt.24:15!

So the translators have been displaying a Jesuit bias when interpreting Matthew 24!

So look at the context of Matthew 24:14-22 again with the Greek properly translated and see if it doesn't make more sense:

quote:

And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the ROMAN EMPIRE (oikoumene) for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the TREMBLING (tromos) come.


No, this is an assumption based on the few facts to which Bob was introduced. The truth is that there IS evidence in a futurist point of view from the very beginning of the “church age,” both internal and external to the biblical record. Just because some Jesuit priest (who may have been led to the Messiah by the Ruach haQodesh Himself through the priest’s studies in God’s Word) RESURRECTED the belief that he heard about through the Montanists who existed some 60 years earlier, doesn’t mean he INVENTED it!

And, this is still a bad translation of the Greek. Should be…

quote:

And this good news about the Kingdom shall be heralded in all the INHABITED WORLD for evidence to all of the non-Jewish-nations; and then shall the END come.
(It’s NT: 5056 “telos,” not NT:5156 “tromos!”)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stormcrow
quote:

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.

And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: For then shall be great tribulation (thlipsis), such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Matthew 24:14-22 (KJV)


This is where we differ in interpretation. I see Yeshua` going back at this point to His present after talking briefly about the future. Verse 14 was about the future, but verses 15-21 are clearly talking about Yeshua`s present as evidenced by (1) letting those who are in Y’hudah (which no longer exists) flee to the mountains, (2) not letting one who is on the housetop come down to get anything out of his house (but to flee by way of the Road of the Rooftops), (3) not letting one who is in the field come back into town to get his clothes, (4) praying that one’s escape not be made during the winter nor on Shabbat (for both would severely hamper traveling distance and would cause a horrible pressure, worse than any other since the beginning of the world-system or any other that would happen after.

Verse 22 is simply saying that the time of pressure on the Jews would not be any longer than necessary so as to avoid a genocide of the Jews, allowing the select few to survive.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stormcrow
And now, the parallel passage from Luke that interprets Matthew:

quote:

And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.

For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. Luke 21:20-24 (KJV)


In fact, despite my earlier contention that verses 4-9 of Matthew 24 coincided with the first 5 seals in Revelation 6, I am now willing to admit I may be wrong on that count (still evaluating this).

Furthermore, on those grounds, I believe Daniel's 70th week was finished in the destruction of Jerusalem and the desolation of Israel, as Luke wrote:

For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

None of this affects my earlier posts on the harmonization of the 6th Seal of Revelation 6 and 7 to Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17.

(Edited to remove absolute statements, as I am still working on this.)

Luke 21 interprets Matthew 24 for us. And what does Luke write again?

For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

The destruction of Jerusalem completed God's wrath against Israel ("days of vengeance"). Israel was reborn in 1948, and Jerusalem was retaken in 1967, signaling the end of its being "trampled under foot by the gentiles."

Any further discussion of eschatology - I believe - needs to start with Israel's rebirth and Jerusalem's reoccupation by the Jews.


Sorry, but no. I actually agree that Lukas’ account in Luke 21:20-24 is about our past, Yeshua`s nearer future; however, one should NOT see this as “the destruction of Jerusalem completing God’s wrath against Isra’el.” They have suffered and continue to suffer for their rebellion and rejection of the Mashiach of God. Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) is STILL being overrun by the Gowyim (the Gentiles or non-Jewish peoples) today! There’s no clearer evidence of that than the Dome of the Rock, not to mention all the tourists from all over!

They won’t be “out of the woods” until (1) they can say, “Baruwk haba’ b’shem YHVH” (We welcome the comer on the authority of YHVH), and (2) the Mashiach returns to rescue His people from yet another attempted genocide.

In the Messiah’s love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2220
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 3/10/2010 6:06:11 PM   
bob97


Posts: 1212
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
Roy, I'm not here to argue Preterism but the facts I listed are based on more than just a few facts.

Continuous Historical

Waldenses: In the "Noble Lessons" (1120) declared the Antichrist to be the Papacy 1100
Joachim Abbas: The harlot city reigning over the kings of the earth undoubtedly meant Rome - "Commentary on the Apocalypse" 1183
Wycliff: The Papacy is the Antichrist of Scripture 1380
John Huss: 1415
Martin Luther: 1522
Zwingli: 1524
John Calvin: 1536
Melancthon: 1543
William Tyndale: 1550
John Knox: 1558
John Foxe: 1586
Thomas Brightman: Opposes Jesuit Ribera's futurism 1644
Isaac Newton 1691
E.B. Elliott: "Horae Apocalypticae" 1851
John Thomas: "Eureka" - Christadelphian exposition on Revelation. 1861
Dr. Grattan Guinness: "The Approaching End of the Age"2 1894
Albert Close: "Antichrist and his Ten Kingdoms" 1917
Baron Porcelli: 1927
F. Walker: "Watchman! What of the Night?" 1942
E.M. Richards: Prophecy magazine of Seventh Day Adventists 1975
Eric Peters: Old Fashioned Prophecy Magazine
Barnes: "Notes on the New Testament"

Futurist

Bellarmine: Roman Catholic expositor 1576
Ribera: Jesuit, founds Futurist school 1580
Alcazar: 1614
Lacunza: Jesuit, published book (4 vols.) "Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty" using Ben Ezra, a converted Jew as a false author. Had a great influence on Protestants. 1701
Samuel MaitlandProtestant librarian to the Archbishop of Canterbury who began tractarian movement publicizing futurism. 1826
Edward Irving: Scottish Presbyterian minister discovers false authorship of Lacunza's work and translates it from Spanish to English. 1830
Darby: Reads Irving's translation of Lacunza's work, founds Plymouth Brethren and introduces futurism to America. 1831
Dr. James Todd: . 1838
John Henry Newman: 1840
E.W. Bullinger: "Companion Bible"1877
Douay Version: 1941
Scofield Bible: 1975
Oral Roberts
Billy Graham
Back to the Bible
Carl McIntire
Herbert Armstrong
De Haan "Lutheran Hour"

Please note the dates of those listed.

Please excuse the formatting but I didn't want to retype all the info.

In Messiah,

Boe

_____________________________

The LORD clears the road for me!
The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
Post #: 2221
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 3/11/2010 11:25:53 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Bob.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bob97

Roy, I'm not here to argue Preterism but the facts I listed are based on more than just a few facts.

Continuous Historical

Waldenses: In the "Noble Lessons" (1120) declared the Antichrist to be the Papacy 1100
Joachim Abbas: The harlot city reigning over the kings of the earth undoubtedly meant Rome - "Commentary on the Apocalypse" 1183
Wycliff: The Papacy is the Antichrist of Scripture 1380
John Huss: 1415
Martin Luther: 1522
Zwingli: 1524
John Calvin: 1536
Melancthon: 1543
William Tyndale: 1550
John Knox: 1558
John Foxe: 1586
Thomas Brightman: Opposes Jesuit Ribera's futurism 1644
Isaac Newton 1691
E.B. Elliott: "Horae Apocalypticae" 1851
John Thomas: "Eureka" - Christadelphian exposition on Revelation. 1861
Dr. Grattan Guinness: "The Approaching End of the Age"2 1894
Albert Close: "Antichrist and his Ten Kingdoms" 1917
Baron Porcelli: 1927
F. Walker: "Watchman! What of the Night?" 1942
E.M. Richards: Prophecy magazine of Seventh Day Adventists 1975
Eric Peters: Old Fashioned Prophecy Magazine
Barnes: "Notes on the New Testament"

Futurist

Bellarmine: Roman Catholic expositor 1576
Ribera: Jesuit, founds Futurist school 1580
Alcazar: 1614
Lacunza: Jesuit, published book (4 vols.) "Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty" using Ben Ezra, a converted Jew as a false author. Had a great influence on Protestants. 1701
Samuel MaitlandProtestant librarian to the Archbishop of Canterbury who began tractarian movement publicizing futurism. 1826
Edward Irving: Scottish Presbyterian minister discovers false authorship of Lacunza's work and translates it from Spanish to English. 1830
Darby: Reads Irving's translation of Lacunza's work, founds Plymouth Brethren and introduces futurism to America. 1831
Dr. James Todd: . 1838
John Henry Newman: 1840
E.W. Bullinger: "Companion Bible"1877
Douay Version: 1941
Scofield Bible: 1975
Oral Roberts
Billy Graham
Back to the Bible
Carl McIntire
Herbert Armstrong
De Haan "Lutheran Hour"

Please note the dates of those listed.

Please excuse the formatting but I didn't want to retype all the info.

In Messiah,

Boe

I'm not debating whether those from the 1100s on didn't believe that the Papacy was the AC; I'm just saying that for a futurist point of view, you didn't go back far enough! We have evidence, first of all, internally to Scripture that the early believers did indeed believe in a futurist point of view! They REALLY did believe that Yeshua` could come back at any time! That's imminency! They fully believed that Yeshua` would come to set up His Kingdom here on this earth!

While such beliefs went underground from the 300s until the 1590s does NOT mean that it wasn't believed throughout that time period! The Ana-Baptists (Re-Baptizers), who were around since the 300s, according to Cardinal Hosius, certainly held a futurist point of view!

The viewpoint was NOT "invented" by the Jesuit priest, Ribera!

That's what I'm trying to tell you. Bottom line? It's OKAY TO BELIEVE IN A FUTURIST POINT OF VIEW! In fact, it's much closer to the Apostles' theology to do so.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2222
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 3/12/2010 10:01:29 AM   
Reba

 

Posts: 771
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline
Folks looking for an earthy kingdom 2000 years caused a lot of trouble.....

_____________________________

Chapter and verse are posted so all may look up the context.
Post #: 2223
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 3/15/2010 2:26:53 AM   
Stormcrow

 

Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

however, one should NOT see this as “the destruction of Jerusalem completing God’s wrath against Isra’el.”


I disagree:

Read Ezekiel starting in chapter 4 and going through chapter 11 to see what God saw in them and why He judged them so harshly! Here's a snippet:

9 'And because of all your abominations, I will do among you what I have not done, and the like of which I will never do again. 10 'Therefore, fathers will eat their sons among you, and sons will eat their fathers; for I will execute judgments on you, and scatter all your remnant to every wind. Ezekiel 5:9-10 (NASB77)

11 'So as I live,' declares the Lord God, 'surely, because you have defiled My sanctuary with all your detestable idols and with all your abominations, therefore I will also withdraw, and My eye shall have no pity and I will not spare. 12 'One third of you will die by plague or be consumed by famine among you, one third will fall by the sword around you, and one third I will scatter to every wind, and I will unsheathe a sword behind them. 13

'Thus My anger will be spent, and I will satisfy My wrath on them, and I shall be appeased; then they will know that I, the Lord, have spoken in My zeal when I have spent My wrath upon them. 14 'Moreover, I will make you a desolation and a reproach among the nations which surround you, in the sight of all who pass by. Ezekiel 5:11-14 (NASB77)

Ezekiel 4-11 relates specifically to the fall of Jerusalem and the desolation of Israel fulfilled in 70 AD.

Rest of post here:

http://forums.christianity.com/fb.aspx?m=4790799
Post #: 2224
RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread - 3/16/2010 12:12:08 AM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 762
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Stormcrow.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stormcrow

quote:

however, one should NOT see this as “the destruction of Jerusalem completing God’s wrath against Isra’el.”


I disagree:

Read Ezekiel starting in chapter 4 and going through chapter 11 to see what God saw in them and why He judged them so harshly! Here's a snippet:

9 'And because of all your abominations, I will do among you what I have not done, and the like of which I will never do again. 10 'Therefore, fathers will eat their sons among you, and sons will eat their fathers; for I will execute judgments on you, and scatter all your remnant to every wind. Ezekiel 5:9-10 (NASB77)

11 'So as I live,' declares the Lord God, 'surely, because you have defiled My sanctuary with all your detestable idols and with all your abominations, therefore I will also withdraw, and My eye shall have no pity and I will not spare. 12 'One third of you will die by plague or be consumed by famine among you, one third will fall by the sword around you, and one third I will scatter to every wind, and I will unsheathe a sword behind them. 13

'Thus My anger will be spent, and I will satisfy My wrath on them, and I shall be appeased; then they will know that I, the Lord, have spoken in My zeal when I have spent My wrath upon them. 14 'Moreover, I will make you a desolation and a reproach among the nations which surround you, in the sight of all who pass by. Ezekiel 5:11-14 (NASB77)

Ezekiel 4-11 relates specifically to the fall of Jerusalem and the desolation of Israel fulfilled in 70 AD.

Rest of post here:

http://forums.christianity.com/fb.aspx?m=4790799


Disagree if you'd like; it's a free country. HOWEVER, look around today! Look at the near history of the Jews! Their desolation has NOT been ended! To the contrary, through pogroms, inquisitions, the Holocaust, and today's terrorist activities, they are STILL suffering! It didn't stop in 70 A.D; it STARTED in 70 A.D! And, it's been going on ever since! It didn't stop in 1948; it didn't stop in 1967; it didn't stop when they gave away the Gaza Strip; it didn't stop with ANY of the various "cease-fires," "treaties," or "concessions" they've made with their enemies! THE DESOLATION OF THE JEWS CONTINUES TODAY!

And, it will continue to plague Isra'el until they can say, as Yeshua` said they would have to, "Baruwk haba' b'shem YHVH!" They MUST be willing to welcome the Comer, Yeshua` the Messiah of God, on YHVH'S authority! When they can do that, then they will be able to see Yeshua` again, coming back in the clouds of the sky just as He left them.

Now, I have absolutely no problem with the passage from Yechezk'el's prophecy you quoted, but you need to understand that verse 13 above HAS NOT YET BEEN FULFILLED because HIS ANGER AND WRATH WITH THEM HAS NOT YET BEEN SPENT! Do you think this was done overnight?! God's wrath can span the centuries because a "thousand years are as a day" with God! Once goaded to action, His anger is not so easily placated!

On the other hand, you also need to know that the Ruach haQodesh is doing a GREAT thing within the borders of Isra'el today! More and more of the Jews are DAILY coming to the understanding that Yeshua` was and is their Messiah! Tens of thousands have already come to believe that Yeshua` is the Messiah and are looking for His coming! The orthodox Jews are up in arms right now, struggling and fighting with the "missionaries." There are bombings of Messianic synagogues, death threats against them, and terrorist attacks by the Jews against the Messianic believers! Furthermore, there are "closet believers" who are orthodox Jews but believers in Yeshua`, but they are afraid to make their faith public!

Pray for them. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, which will only truly be realized when the Sar Shalom, the Prince of Peace, returns.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 2225
Page:   <<   < prev  87 88 [89] 90 91   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Prophecy & End Times >> RE: Preterism vs. Futurism - One Stop Thread
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  87 88 [89] 90 91   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI